November 4th, 2019

🕒 Wiki Weekly #25! 🕑

It's November!
We've listed pages that need some love. Take a look!

Latest Announcements

User talk:Darre

From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hello

Zwlogo2dsmall.png
Hi there, Darre, and welcome to Zelda Wiki! Why not check out the community hub? To find out what's been going on recently at the wiki and what articles users are editing right now, head to the Recent Changes. For general wiki-related discussion and questions, head over to the Discussion Center. Also, for wiki usage and policy help, check out our Help Guide. We hope you enjoy the wiki. Thanks!
— The Zelda Wiki Staff

-- TheStoneWatcher (talk) 17:53, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Queen Zelda

The Princess Zelda page is only for canon appearances, please use the Princess Zelda/Other Appearances page to add anything that is non-canon, in this case Hyrule Warriors. The Hyrule Warriors section is just a stub, so all the info you got is more than welcome there. Chuck (talk) 19:35, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Mr. Aonuma has confirmed that Hyrule Warriors isn't canon. Please stop replacing the non-canon templates with ambiguously canon templates for Hyrule Warriors-related subjects on pages. Nintendocan (talk) 00:30, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

He stated it was its own canonical dimension that pulled from the high canon so it is canonical in that anything there was pulled in from the main Zelda games, so characters like Agitha and Midna are taken from the regular canon from different points in time through the timespace portal rather than that universe's version of the character, as he had said in different forms since announcement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darre (talk) 02:06, 26 June 2014‎
If your theory is accurate, then that could be said the same about all other non-canon games in the series. But are they labeled as ambiguously canon? Also, he did say it was like its own separate dimension, but he never said it was canonical. Nintendocan (talk) 04:12, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Thats why I put Ambiguously Canon he said it wasn't apart of the main canon but never stated it to be confirmed to be canon like Link's Crossbow Training which is Ambiguously Canon —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darre (talk) 17:12, 27 June 2014
Due to a recent interview with Aonuma, Zelda Wiki does not consider Hyrule Warriors to be canon or ambiguously canon. Also, please remember to sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~). - TonyT S C 01:10, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Multiple edits

Hello! I noticed you've been making a lot of edits to the same page over a short time. Doing this puts a large strain on our server and clogs up the recent changes. So instead of saving a lot, use the "show preview" button next to the "save page" button. It'll allow you to view your edit for any mistakes so you don't have to make a lot of fixing edits or additional ones! :) — Hylian King [*] 17:50, 30 June 2014 (UTC)