May 16, 2020

🏹 Knight Challenge #8 🏹

No distance is too great for Knight Challenges!
From writing, to research, to images, find your preferred way to contribute with our eighth theme: Projectiles!

Latest Announcements


From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Any relation to Eox?--Claire 18:13, 2 February 2008 (EST)

Major bosses

What, so Onox isn't a major enemy or boss?

Clearly not according to someone. I think that may have been accidental though. I've added him back in now. —Adam (talk) 18:43, 29 March 2008 (EDT)

Part this thing!

Who merged the Onox and Dark Dragon pages? I say we part them back. Stallord 18:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

The Dark Dragon page was almost completely a strategy guide. This site is an encyclopedia, not a guide on how to beat the games. If you want strategy, then you'll have to go to GameFAQs or something.Matt (Talk) 19:00, November 20, 2008 (UTC)

Then edit it to not be a stategy guide, yeah? BECAUSE THAT HUGE DRACONIC THING DESERVES HIS OWN PAGE!!!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Stallord (talk) 22:22, November 20, 2008 (UTC)

No. If Beast Ganondorf doesn't get his own page, Dark Dragon doesn't either. Standards, you see? After all, we might as well give Stallord's Skull his own page with this in mind. It's not going to happen.
Just wait until I'm finished editing. The page isn't finished yet, and you're seeing it in its incomplete form. It'll take me as long to edit this page as it does for me to completely play through Oracle of Seasons again. --Felicia's Champion 04:19, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
They are the same character. We won't split them back up.Matt (Talk) 04:44, November 21, 2008 (UTC)

Stallord, please calm down. I'm not an expert on the Oracle games, so I'm not sure how much information could possibly be added, but it really doesn't look like enough to warrant its own page. We don't choose what does and doesn't get its own page based on whether or not it "deserves" it, but rather if there's enough information about that thing to warrant it being its own article. That doesn't appear to be the case here. —Ando (talk) 07:36, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Nearly the entire page was strategy. Other than that there is very little information on him. He's just another form of a boss. So that is one reason why we merged it. Merging the articles makes this one more complete.Matt (Talk) 07:42, November 21, 2008 (UTC)

OK, since your all right, I'll keep down. And Ando, I'm no Oracle Master, either, (I haven't even played either of the games!) but I've done so much research that I could beat any LoZ game in about 8 days or less. Stallord 22:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, it's taking me longer to finish this than I thought, seeing as I've been helping to rip the roof off my house for the last few days and replace it with a new one. Soon, I'll be able to get back to editing it. I should have the game finished in a couple of hours...only six dungeons left. --Felicia's Champion 23:02, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


I flagged this page to be improved because it seems to have slipped beneath the watter. It appears as though people have just been adding random facts/information on this page for quite some time. It looks messy, and is poorly written. I'd really appreciate some help in fixing it up. My thought is that the information needs to be RRR'd (removed, rewritten, and replaced). I'll go ahead and say it- General Onox is a cool character. He needs to have a good page. I'm going to try to bring this up to at least "good article" status, judging by Wikipedia's standards. Anyone care to join in? Alter  {T C B H } 17:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Mega Man Trivia

Should we mention that Onox's final form is similar to Sigma's final form from Mega Man X? I mean the patterns from those two bosses are quite simular, not to mention the strategy.--TrekCaptainUSA 21:25, 11 September 2011 (EDT)

Glad to see someone else noticed. And four months later someone (me) got around to following through on that point. Meganerd18 07:20, 16 January 2012 (EST)

I'd note I think this should be added back, the battles are very similar, I think far too much so to be coincidence. Drake Clawfang (talk) 03:20, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Agreed. The battles are strikingly similar and both games were developed by Capcom. Our new trivia policy isn't formally in effect yet, but I'd say that the trivia meets the criteria, though it may have needed some cleanup. I've reworded it and replaced it in the article. — Hylian King [*] 04:27, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
If Oracle of Seasons wasn't made by Capcom, I'd remove it, but this one actually seems to have evidence behind it. I just both boss battles on YouTube and I agree, they are pretty similar. Champion of Nayru (talk) 04:50, 25 October 2013 (UTC)Champion of Nayru

Gerudo Symbo Trivial

I removed the Gerudo Symbol Trivia from the article because the Gerudo Symbol is plainly visible on Onox's armor in the image. The trivia repeats what a cursory glance at the image would reveal. Hope that clears that up. :) Champion of Nayru (talk) 00:18, 25 October 2013 (UTC)Champion of Nayru

Yeah, but for people who aren't familiar with Zelda or notice the symbol to identify it, it should be left in incase they have that, "OMG, I didn't notice that until I read this" kind of reaction. Plus, leaving it in will also leave a link to the Gerudo page incase they want to read about it also. --Vaati The Wind Demon (talk) 00:20, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
I'm going to try to edit the page to get Crest of the Gerudo in without putting it in the trivia. Something like Onox's brass armor is emblazoned with the Symbol of his master's people.
How's that? Champion of Nayru (talk) 02:19, 25 October 2013 (UTC)Champion of Nayru
Perfecto!! --Vaati The Wind Demon (talk) 02:29, 25 October 2013 (UTC)