May 30, 2020

🐷 Knight Challenge #10 🐷

Feeling boared with no news? Check out these challenges!
From writing, to research, to images, find your preferred way to contribute with our tenth theme: Pigs!

Latest Announcements

We would love to get your opinion on your experience with our site with a short survey. Take Survey

Talk:Mask

From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Guys, I think we're good as far as images go. The OoT masks all feature images, and the other masks all link to the respective pages. Therefore, I'm removing the image template.Justin(Talk) 18:08, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

So if you were to choose between the 2 formats for the Mask Listing, which would it be? The Table I made for the OoT masks or just a plain pipelink stack? I wanted to get more than my own opinion before completing the project and potentially having it reverted. Axiomist (talk) 18:35, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
I personally think you should just link them to their respective pages. This is supposed to be a listing page, not a descriptive page.Justin(Talk) 18:39, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
It serves to help someone looking for info find which mask they were looking for to begin with. But I'll revert if others agree. I didn't put massive effort into it. Also nothing else is pipelinked here, which is the difference between Listings and Articles. Axiomist (talk) 18:45, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Singular?

I thought singular form was always preferred over plural. So... shouldn't this page have stayed "Mask", even though there are many? Embyr 75  --Talk-- 03:01, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Ask Ember, he made the move. Alternatively, you can just move back Masks to Mask (not through direct revert, though, since he later made an edit, one unambiguously good), and provide the reason in the summary. =) --K2L 05:55, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Wow, talk about speed! Someone completely unknown made the move back! Some users impress me O_o --K2L 05:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Add in-game descriptions?

I feel like adding the in-game descriptions in the table might help this article. Anyone else in favor? Dekler 20:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Not a bad idea. Go for it.Justin(Talk) 23:57, 15 January 2013 (UTC)