November 4th, 2019

🕒 Wiki Weekly #25! 🕑

It's November!
We've listed pages that need some love. Take a look!

Latest Announcements

We are currently performing an upgrade to our software. This upgrade will bring MediaWiki from version 1.31 to 1.33. While the upgrade is being performed on your wiki it will be in read-only mode. For more information check here.

Talk:Keaton

From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Do you think we should put the keaton questions on this article? RupeeLord 01:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Well, I put them there. Of course, if you all agree for the removal, it can be removed. ZW is here for information. What would the Keaton page be without its Keaton questions?User:Austin/sig 04:40, 22 February 2009 (UTC)


I mean put the actual questions on the page, or in their own article. RupeeLord(EDN) 16:13, 2 May 2009 (UTC)



What about the keatons of A Link to the Past? RupeeLord(EDN) 01:19, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

There are Keatons in ALttP? Where? O_o Dany36 01:41, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
There's 'Keatons' in Thieve's Town... The Kakariko village of Dark World. Edit: Fail for not leaving signature. - AtrumLevis  (My Talk Page) (My Contributions) 01:45, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Also in the Village of Outcasts RupeeLord(EDN) 01:50, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
^I think that's what she's referring to. XD And anyway, I guess they should be added, then! Anyone want to volunteer? :P Dany36 01:51, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Split The Minish Cap section into its own page

Should we split The Minish Cap section? I must admit that it's kind of awkward having a page for both an enemy and a peaceful race/character. For those concerned about the size of the page, I've written up a mock article on my Sandbox. There's also an example of what this page will look like if it is split here. - TonyT S C 20:13, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

That doesn't seem like a bad idea; the enemy and the species are very different after all. Splitting the page would be logical and I can't see any reason not to. Also, the two pages would each contain a decent amount of information. I say go ahead. Dannyboy601Talk 21:25, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
+1 support for a split. They're really the same in name only. Embyr 75  --Talk-- 21:41, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Same here on the idea for the split both "mock pages" seem to be well made enough to be there own pages. --Shadow Reaper 06:36, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Since it's been a while, I think I'll go through with the split. Unless someone has a better suggestion, this page will stay where it is and be the focus of the species, while the information on the enemy will be moved to "Keaton (Enemy)." - TonyT S C 23:31, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Agreed, and a disambiguation page will also be produced, correct? Champion of Nayru (talk) 03:38, 24 September 2013 (UTC)Champion of Nayru
I don't see how. If this page is going to stay here, where would we put the disambig?
My intention was, as on my sandbox, to put a small notice up at the top of the page. That's usually how we do things in lieu of a disambig. I think to move this page to make way for a disambig would be more confusing for readers. (It's also creating two pages when you could create just one for little difference.) - TonyT S C 06:28, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Pokemon Reference?

I know in the German version of OoT, when you go talk to Zelda wearing the Keaton mask, she says "Oh, you're one of those Pocket Monsters" or something like that referencing Pikachu. Think that and any other references are okay? (Alex95 (talk) 00:26, 14 October 2015 (UTC))

If you have a source for that (like a text dump), you could add it to the Keaton Mask trivia section instead. - Chuck * (Talk) 03:16, 14 October 2015 (UTC)