Talk:Hyrule Warriors: Age of Calamity
How come its still considered a spin-off since they made it clear that this game is basically their canon way of telling the story of the events that took place 100 years before Breath of the Wild events? -- Wolfgerlion64 (talk) 16:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- The Hyrule Warriors series is a spin-off series, and this new game has "Hyrule Warriors:" in the title, which makes it part of that series. But remember, being a spin-off doesn't automatically make it non-canon. There are other game series that have had canon spin-offs before, it's nothing new. — 𝐌𝐚𝐠𝐢𝐜𝐦𝐚𝐬𝐨𝐧𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎 (𝙩𝙖𝙡𝙠) 18:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- I can understand some people wondering why this is still considered a spin-off even though they confirmed it being a prequel. It's just kinda weird seeing this being treated as spin-off while The Adventure of Link (which has a completely different gameplay system (and minor different name pattern) than any other games in the series) being treated as main game. Even more since this is completely seperated to the original Hyrule Warriors title. I'd still put it as spin-off on this website, but might need to be discussed in the future depending on how Nintendo themself treat this game in the future like are they gonna list it amongst main games on official sources or do they list it seperate etc. --Raygius (talk) 17:21, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
First canon Zelda game with multiple main playable characters?
Would Age of Calamity qualify as this? Or would Spirit Tracks be considered this? Though I guess if we wanna stretch it, Four Swords would be the first one. Scorching Emblem (talk) 07:15, 10 October 2020 (UTC)